<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mortgage Cancer &#8211; Senators, CEO&#8217;s and Celebrities, No One is Immune</title>
	<atom:link href="http://loanworkout.org/2008/06/mortgage-cancer-senators-ceos-and-celebrities-no-one-is-immune/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://loanworkout.org/2008/06/mortgage-cancer-senators-ceos-and-celebrities-no-one-is-immune/</link>
	<description>Loan Modification &#38; Home Loan News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:55:43 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: alan</title>
		<link>http://loanworkout.org/2008/06/mortgage-cancer-senators-ceos-and-celebrities-no-one-is-immune/#comment-11537</link>
		<dc:creator>alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loanworkout.org/?p=1054#comment-11537</guid>
		<description>I call bull shit on the statement that Fed is major contributor to bubbles. Again does anyone  bother to look at history pre Fed ? It&#039;s tiring to read all these stupid Paultards&#039; market crashes were even more ferocious pre Fed judging strictly by numbers. You can thank American enterprising risk taking spirit coupled with herd mentality for that. It won&#039;t matter a bit if there is a Fed or not, bubbles will be just the same if not worse as long as people don&#039;t change. I have yet to see concrete evidence with good numbers that confirms that post Fed bubbles are worse than pre Fed ones.

How about railroad bubbles for starters:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panic_of_1873
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panic_of_1893

Or do we like pure financial ones more:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panic_of_1907

The freaking point that I&#039;m attempting to drive home to all those Paultards: severity of bubbles and crashes ain&#039;t going to decrease. Please spare that populist bull crap that somehow everything will be peachy.

Fed acting as a lender of last resort is an implicit risk socializer: when someone makes bet of the size that can destabilize entire country and if gambler loses the bet Fed gets involved, it spreads gambler&#039; losses onto us, taxpayers to cushion the blow because gambler can and will cause domino effect. Pre Fed with no implicit risk socializer in the picture anyone could make as large bet (this is a free country) as he wished leading to series of spectacular crashes when bunch of gamblers made the same large bets.

Anyone who thinks that lack of great loss socializer is going to make gambler think twice about betting all on red is delusional and doesn&#039;t know much about fellow humans. Especially in US where risk taking is cultural norm. Fed doesn&#039;t cause bubbles, Fed spreads cost of bubbles on all of us and in exchange for that it gets the right to regulate size and type of bets gamblers can make though it looks like it ain&#039;t doing the job very well. Nevertheless I don&#039;t believe for a second that those reckless bets wouldn&#039;t have occurred without Fed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I call bull shit on the statement that Fed is major contributor to bubbles. Again does anyone  bother to look at history pre Fed ? It&#8217;s tiring to read all these stupid Paultards&#8217; market crashes were even more ferocious pre Fed judging strictly by numbers. You can thank American enterprising risk taking spirit coupled with herd mentality for that. It won&#8217;t matter a bit if there is a Fed or not, bubbles will be just the same if not worse as long as people don&#8217;t change. I have yet to see concrete evidence with good numbers that confirms that post Fed bubbles are worse than pre Fed ones.</p>
<p>How about railroad bubbles for starters:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panic_of_1873" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panic_of_1873</a><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panic_of_1893" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panic_of_1893</a></p>
<p>Or do we like pure financial ones more:  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panic_of_1907" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panic_of_1907</a></p>
<p>The freaking point that I&#8217;m attempting to drive home to all those Paultards: severity of bubbles and crashes ain&#8217;t going to decrease. Please spare that populist bull crap that somehow everything will be peachy.</p>
<p>Fed acting as a lender of last resort is an implicit risk socializer: when someone makes bet of the size that can destabilize entire country and if gambler loses the bet Fed gets involved, it spreads gambler&#8217; losses onto us, taxpayers to cushion the blow because gambler can and will cause domino effect. Pre Fed with no implicit risk socializer in the picture anyone could make as large bet (this is a free country) as he wished leading to series of spectacular crashes when bunch of gamblers made the same large bets.</p>
<p>Anyone who thinks that lack of great loss socializer is going to make gambler think twice about betting all on red is delusional and doesn&#8217;t know much about fellow humans. Especially in US where risk taking is cultural norm. Fed doesn&#8217;t cause bubbles, Fed spreads cost of bubbles on all of us and in exchange for that it gets the right to regulate size and type of bets gamblers can make though it looks like it ain&#8217;t doing the job very well. Nevertheless I don&#8217;t believe for a second that those reckless bets wouldn&#8217;t have occurred without Fed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gatorbait</title>
		<link>http://loanworkout.org/2008/06/mortgage-cancer-senators-ceos-and-celebrities-no-one-is-immune/#comment-11536</link>
		<dc:creator>gatorbait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 04:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loanworkout.org/?p=1054#comment-11536</guid>
		<description>litm-

some of us do but get dragged into a non-issue and end up defending something that was never said and accused of some sort of revival love-fest.

I think you pretty much covered the responsibility issue and the financial end of things was covered on this and many of the other blog tag lines.

When the facts are presented it seems it becomes an attack board with threats and bad analogies.

I agree some have pontificated with no solutions offered. I would be interested to hear an end game from those who feel the borrowers were scammed. Not &quot;abolish the FED&quot; rhetoric.

It seems to me a bailout is inevitable, I am just not sure what to bet on except the big banks.

Oil is doomed to plummet..just a question of when at this point. Demand destruction seems to be building momentum..all this talk about drilling offshore....i know this is a snowball chance. However the mid east is not so sure of that since we seem to jump into the river with little planning so i believe the Saudis will dump more supply on the market.

I know the chant..inflation..inflation but I see this mainly in food and oil due to their relationship. I am buying things now that are 30-40% less than 6 months ago. (electronics/clothing) Even at the grocery store I have been picking up 2 for 1 the past few months on staple items. I think core is still low based on what is going on but if the funds rate is not brought up by 1-1.5% then we will get a whole lot deeper into worst case predictions.

By the time congress finally gets to their handouts the whole mess may be near the end anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>litm-</p>
<p>some of us do but get dragged into a non-issue and end up defending something that was never said and accused of some sort of revival love-fest.</p>
<p>I think you pretty much covered the responsibility issue and the financial end of things was covered on this and many of the other blog tag lines.</p>
<p>When the facts are presented it seems it becomes an attack board with threats and bad analogies.</p>
<p>I agree some have pontificated with no solutions offered. I would be interested to hear an end game from those who feel the borrowers were scammed. Not &#8220;abolish the FED&#8221; rhetoric.</p>
<p>It seems to me a bailout is inevitable, I am just not sure what to bet on except the big banks.</p>
<p>Oil is doomed to plummet..just a question of when at this point. Demand destruction seems to be building momentum..all this talk about drilling offshore&#8230;.i know this is a snowball chance. However the mid east is not so sure of that since we seem to jump into the river with little planning so i believe the Saudis will dump more supply on the market.</p>
<p>I know the chant..inflation..inflation but I see this mainly in food and oil due to their relationship. I am buying things now that are 30-40% less than 6 months ago. (electronics/clothing) Even at the grocery store I have been picking up 2 for 1 the past few months on staple items. I think core is still low based on what is going on but if the funds rate is not brought up by 1-1.5% then we will get a whole lot deeper into worst case predictions.</p>
<p>By the time congress finally gets to their handouts the whole mess may be near the end anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://loanworkout.org/2008/06/mortgage-cancer-senators-ceos-and-celebrities-no-one-is-immune/#comment-11535</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 01:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loanworkout.org/?p=1054#comment-11535</guid>
		<description>Commodity prices are another examples of stocks and futures trading based upon speculation and historical data which boils down to essentially gambling on future prices.  Again, Wall Street created this fiasco and fueled the bubble, everyone from the top down to the brokers and realtors were receiving commissions based upon the dollar value of the amounts being traded.  Since the folks underwriting and approving the loans had no risk as they weren&#039;t lending their own money they threw economics out the window and here we sit.

The average Joe didn&#039;t know what was happening here, no one successful in business has gotten where they are without taking some risk.  And in borrowing money on a secured note (especially in a non-recourse state like like California) I&#039;m sorry to say that the lender/investor is the real risk taker, the borrower may suffer the consequences of &#039;bad credit&#039; but in most cases they won&#039;t be out any cash.

The banker (blinded by Wall Street and short-sighted profit margins) is still the biggest idiot in the room, regardless of the politics or emotion involved.  Unfortunately, the rest of us will collectively pay the price despite our involvement, or lack there of.

Best of luck to you as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Commodity prices are another examples of stocks and futures trading based upon speculation and historical data which boils down to essentially gambling on future prices.  Again, Wall Street created this fiasco and fueled the bubble, everyone from the top down to the brokers and realtors were receiving commissions based upon the dollar value of the amounts being traded.  Since the folks underwriting and approving the loans had no risk as they weren&#8217;t lending their own money they threw economics out the window and here we sit.</p>
<p>The average Joe didn&#8217;t know what was happening here, no one successful in business has gotten where they are without taking some risk.  And in borrowing money on a secured note (especially in a non-recourse state like like California) I&#8217;m sorry to say that the lender/investor is the real risk taker, the borrower may suffer the consequences of &#8216;bad credit&#8217; but in most cases they won&#8217;t be out any cash.</p>
<p>The banker (blinded by Wall Street and short-sighted profit margins) is still the biggest idiot in the room, regardless of the politics or emotion involved.  Unfortunately, the rest of us will collectively pay the price despite our involvement, or lack there of.</p>
<p>Best of luck to you as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lookinthemirror</title>
		<link>http://loanworkout.org/2008/06/mortgage-cancer-senators-ceos-and-celebrities-no-one-is-immune/#comment-11534</link>
		<dc:creator>Lookinthemirror</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 01:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loanworkout.org/?p=1054#comment-11534</guid>
		<description>Carrie-

Of course it does.  Many banks will do that when they believe that it makes economic sense to do it.  Until then, they will use the &quot;hammer&quot; method on homeowner&#039;s (notice of defaults).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carrie-</p>
<p>Of course it does.  Many banks will do that when they believe that it makes economic sense to do it.  Until then, they will use the &#8220;hammer&#8221; method on homeowner&#8217;s (notice of defaults).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lookinthemirror</title>
		<link>http://loanworkout.org/2008/06/mortgage-cancer-senators-ceos-and-celebrities-no-one-is-immune/#comment-11533</link>
		<dc:creator>Lookinthemirror</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 01:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loanworkout.org/?p=1054#comment-11533</guid>
		<description>Tom-

There are ALWAYS bubbles in a capitalistic society.  Take a look at commodity prices right now.  Real Estate is the same.  You purchase a home to live in, and a take a mortgage that is affordable....if you do not, you suffer the consequences.

On the macro level, this is a HUGE mess.  Banks should do anything possible to preserve the values of their underlying assets (home prices).  Unfortunately, this debt boom has cut a swath through ALL sectors of the economy.  I am all for a one-time tax increase for people earning over a certain amount of money provided it only goes to pay down the Federal Deficit.  That would help strenthen our dollar.  When and if the Deficit evre get&#039;s under control, the Congress and Executive Branches need to adopt a balanced budget amendment that many states have (and the Federal Government USED to have).  We are in uncharted waters as a debtor nation, and we are now controlled by the whims of foreign investors.  No simple solutions.....I keep hearing on this post:  &quot;abolish the FED&quot;...well, for one, that won&#039;t happen, so why waste time floating that idea out there???  We need to have realistic discourse about this problem.  I wish you well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom-</p>
<p>There are ALWAYS bubbles in a capitalistic society.  Take a look at commodity prices right now.  Real Estate is the same.  You purchase a home to live in, and a take a mortgage that is affordable&#8230;.if you do not, you suffer the consequences.</p>
<p>On the macro level, this is a HUGE mess.  Banks should do anything possible to preserve the values of their underlying assets (home prices).  Unfortunately, this debt boom has cut a swath through ALL sectors of the economy.  I am all for a one-time tax increase for people earning over a certain amount of money provided it only goes to pay down the Federal Deficit.  That would help strenthen our dollar.  When and if the Deficit evre get&#8217;s under control, the Congress and Executive Branches need to adopt a balanced budget amendment that many states have (and the Federal Government USED to have).  We are in uncharted waters as a debtor nation, and we are now controlled by the whims of foreign investors.  No simple solutions&#8230;..I keep hearing on this post:  &#8220;abolish the FED&#8221;&#8230;well, for one, that won&#8217;t happen, so why waste time floating that idea out there???  We need to have realistic discourse about this problem.  I wish you well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://loanworkout.org/2008/06/mortgage-cancer-senators-ceos-and-celebrities-no-one-is-immune/#comment-11532</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 01:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loanworkout.org/?p=1054#comment-11532</guid>
		<description>Yes, but you fail to realize why they went up quickly - and historically this has never happened before in this manner.  If the banks didn&#039;t see this, how were the buyers to see it.

From the cost of your home it appears you are voting to increase your own taxes to better our economy and I applaud your efforts and think you ought to get on a bandwagon and take your idea to Congress.

Additionally, I agree with your statement that many folks took out loans they could not afford.  Nevertheless, accepting that fact only aggrevates the problem and leads us no closer to a solution.  Hindsight is always 20/20.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but you fail to realize why they went up quickly &#8211; and historically this has never happened before in this manner.  If the banks didn&#8217;t see this, how were the buyers to see it.</p>
<p>From the cost of your home it appears you are voting to increase your own taxes to better our economy and I applaud your efforts and think you ought to get on a bandwagon and take your idea to Congress.</p>
<p>Additionally, I agree with your statement that many folks took out loans they could not afford.  Nevertheless, accepting that fact only aggrevates the problem and leads us no closer to a solution.  Hindsight is always 20/20.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie</title>
		<link>http://loanworkout.org/2008/06/mortgage-cancer-senators-ceos-and-celebrities-no-one-is-immune/#comment-11531</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loanworkout.org/?p=1054#comment-11531</guid>
		<description>Lookinthemirro:
doesn&#039;t it make sense for the bank/investor to modify at a lower rate for the borrower and the bank continue to get paid,  versus foreclosing, getting no money &amp; adding yet another property to the court system and when it does sell in foreclosure have sold it for a  big loss?

i would prefer to continue to get paid...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lookinthemirro:<br />
doesn&#8217;t it make sense for the bank/investor to modify at a lower rate for the borrower and the bank continue to get paid,  versus foreclosing, getting no money &amp; adding yet another property to the court system and when it does sell in foreclosure have sold it for a  big loss?</p>
<p>i would prefer to continue to get paid&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lookinthemirror</title>
		<link>http://loanworkout.org/2008/06/mortgage-cancer-senators-ceos-and-celebrities-no-one-is-immune/#comment-11530</link>
		<dc:creator>Lookinthemirror</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loanworkout.org/?p=1054#comment-11530</guid>
		<description>Tom-

Nice post about the banks working with the borrowers to muddle our way out of this mess.  I agree with that.  Does the bank have to: NO.  They will only do it if it makes economic sense for them to do it.

You still fail to address the CORE problem.  People accepted more debt than they should have.  With regard to my stock market comment, I was making a personal statement about what may happen down the road.

Real estate prices don&#039;t always go up.....if you believe that, I have some property for sale in the Everglades.  The root problem is that Americans took on too much debt, and now it is time to pay the piper.

P.S.  I live in California and purchased a home for 1.6M,  in 2003.  I completed a remodel, and at the peak of the market, my house was worth probably 2.6M.  Now it is worth around 2.2M.  Should I blame the bank and my contractor because my property is now worth less???  They should have known that real estate prices were going to go down.  That&#039;s what many people on this blog site are doing.  They accepted terms on a loan that was TOO EXPENSIVE....NOW, THEY ARE PAYING THE PRICE.  THE BANKS ARE PAYING THE PRICE BY ALLOWING UNDERWRITING GUIDELINES TO BECOME TOO LOOSE.....see it all makes sense.  Lucky, we live in a society where you can CHOOSE not to buy a home!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom-</p>
<p>Nice post about the banks working with the borrowers to muddle our way out of this mess.  I agree with that.  Does the bank have to: NO.  They will only do it if it makes economic sense for them to do it.</p>
<p>You still fail to address the CORE problem.  People accepted more debt than they should have.  With regard to my stock market comment, I was making a personal statement about what may happen down the road.</p>
<p>Real estate prices don&#8217;t always go up&#8230;..if you believe that, I have some property for sale in the Everglades.  The root problem is that Americans took on too much debt, and now it is time to pay the piper.</p>
<p>P.S.  I live in California and purchased a home for 1.6M,  in 2003.  I completed a remodel, and at the peak of the market, my house was worth probably 2.6M.  Now it is worth around 2.2M.  Should I blame the bank and my contractor because my property is now worth less???  They should have known that real estate prices were going to go down.  That&#8217;s what many people on this blog site are doing.  They accepted terms on a loan that was TOO EXPENSIVE&#8230;.NOW, THEY ARE PAYING THE PRICE.  THE BANKS ARE PAYING THE PRICE BY ALLOWING UNDERWRITING GUIDELINES TO BECOME TOO LOOSE&#8230;..see it all makes sense.  Lucky, we live in a society where you can CHOOSE not to buy a home!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie</title>
		<link>http://loanworkout.org/2008/06/mortgage-cancer-senators-ceos-and-celebrities-no-one-is-immune/#comment-11529</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loanworkout.org/?p=1054#comment-11529</guid>
		<description>nice Tom !!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice Tom !!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie</title>
		<link>http://loanworkout.org/2008/06/mortgage-cancer-senators-ceos-and-celebrities-no-one-is-immune/#comment-11528</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loanworkout.org/?p=1054#comment-11528</guid>
		<description>LOOK IN THE MIRROR  -

some people have answered your questions, you just do not like their answers or alternatives....

Gator

atleast for me-  I have learned a lot from everyone, even those whose views differ from mine, it gives me a different perspective on how to see things.    but somehow the facts are the facts:  yes the borrower signed the note, &amp; yes he is held by contract to pay  -  but how he was made to sign or other factors involved are a big problem....

I believe that most of us here are trying to find solutions, learn from others mistakes and i for one want to help those that I can.  i don&#039;t want to do like lookinthemirror and tell them just sell you house &amp; move on...  (besides that is an awful idea especially in a market where the appraised values have dropped below what you owe so how can you sell?)  i would rather offer a way to save their homes if they can, different options to mediate with the bank or find an attorney that can review your loan for predatory lending or errors.

Look - lookinthemirror  -  most people were not born into a family with silver &amp; gold spoons,  most people work paycheck to paycheck and by you putting them down &amp; telling them they made huge enormous mistakes - is not going to make it better.  All that energy &amp; time you have on your hands, why don&#039;t you focus on finding who is truly responsible for all this corrupted mortgage realestate economic mess that we are all in.  because trust me if there are homes in your neighborhood being foreclosed your property valued just dropped too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOOK IN THE MIRROR  -</p>
<p>some people have answered your questions, you just do not like their answers or alternatives&#8230;.</p>
<p>Gator</p>
<p>atleast for me-  I have learned a lot from everyone, even those whose views differ from mine, it gives me a different perspective on how to see things.    but somehow the facts are the facts:  yes the borrower signed the note, &amp; yes he is held by contract to pay  &#8211;  but how he was made to sign or other factors involved are a big problem&#8230;.</p>
<p>I believe that most of us here are trying to find solutions, learn from others mistakes and i for one want to help those that I can.  i don&#8217;t want to do like lookinthemirror and tell them just sell you house &amp; move on&#8230;  (besides that is an awful idea especially in a market where the appraised values have dropped below what you owe so how can you sell?)  i would rather offer a way to save their homes if they can, different options to mediate with the bank or find an attorney that can review your loan for predatory lending or errors.</p>
<p>Look &#8211; lookinthemirror  &#8211;  most people were not born into a family with silver &amp; gold spoons,  most people work paycheck to paycheck and by you putting them down &amp; telling them they made huge enormous mistakes &#8211; is not going to make it better.  All that energy &amp; time you have on your hands, why don&#8217;t you focus on finding who is truly responsible for all this corrupted mortgage realestate economic mess that we are all in.  because trust me if there are homes in your neighborhood being foreclosed your property valued just dropped too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
